Jeffrey R. Holland's "Musket Fire" Talk
What's the "Musket Fire" talk?
On August 23, 2021, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland[BIO] addressed BYU faculty, asking them to both build and defend the Church, comparing their role to Nauvoo temple builders wielding a trowel in one hand and a musket in the other.[1] He also spoke on defending teachings on gender and same-sex marriage.[2] The media later dubbed it the "musket fire speech."[3]
What was the main focus of the talk?
Elder Holland's talk focused on BYU's unique character, history, and responsibility to teach gospel principles.[4] However, during a portion of the 40-minute address, he asked the faculty to defend the Church's position on LGBTQ+ issues.[5]
So what did he mean by "musket fire"? Did Elder Holland encourage Church members to be violent against LGBTQ+ people?
No. Elder Holland referenced Nauvoo Temple builders working with "a trowel in one hand" to build the temple and "a musket in the other" to defend against those who attacked the Church, using it as a metaphor to encourage BYU faculty to defend the teachings of the Church.[6] In the latter part of the talk, he also referred to the idea of musket fire as a metaphor.[7]
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland's Use of the "Musket" Metaphor in His BYU Speech
Jeffrey R. Holland, "The Second Half of the Second Century of Brigham Young University," August 23, 2021.[8] |
. . . in 2017, Elder Dallin H. Oaks, not then but soon to be in the First Presidency, where he would sit only one chair—one heartbeat—away from the same position President Nelson now has, quoted our colleague Elder Neal A. Maxwell, who had said: In a way [Church of Jesus Christ] scholars at BYU and elsewhere are a little bit like the builders of the temple in Nauvoo, who worked with a trowel in one hand and a musket in the other. Today scholars building the temple of learning must also pause on occasion to defend the kingdom. I personally think this is one of the reasons the Lord established and maintains this university. The dual role of builder and defender is unique and ongoing. I am grateful we have scholars today who can handle, as it were, both trowels and muskets. To this, Elder Oaks then challengingly responded, “I would like to hear a little more musket fire from this temple of learning.” He said this in a way that could have applied to a host of topics in various departments, but the one he specifically mentioned was the doctrine of the family and defending marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Little did he know that while many would hear his appeal, especially the School of Family Life, which moved quickly and visibly to assist, some others fired their muskets all right, but unfortunately they didn’t always aim at those hostile to the Church. We thought a couple of stray rounds even went north of the Point of the Mountain! My beloved brothers and sisters, “a house . . . divided against itself . . . cannot stand,” and I will go to my grave pleading that this institution not only stands but stands unquestionably committed to its unique academic mission and to the Church that sponsors it. We hope it isn’t a surprise to you that your trustees are not deaf or blind to the feelings that swirl around marriage and the whole same-sex topic on campus—and a lot of other topics. I and many of my Brethren have spent more time and shed more tears on this subject than we could ever adequately convey to you this morning or any morning. We have spent hours discussing what the doctrine of the Church can and cannot provide the individuals and families struggling over this difficult issue. So it is with a little scar tissue of our own that we are trying to avoid—and hope all will try to avoid—language, symbols, and situations that are more divisive than unifying at the very time we want to show love for all of God’s children. . . . Musket fire? Yes, we will always need defenders of the faith, but “friendly fire” is a tragedy—and from time to time the Church, its leaders, and some of our colleagues within the university community have taken such fire on this campus. And sometimes it isn’t friendly, wounding students and the parents of students—so many who are confused about what so much recent flag-waving and parade-holding on this issue means. My beloved friends, this kind of confusion and conflict ought not to be. Not here. There are better ways to move toward crucially important goals in these very difficult matters—ways that show empathy and understanding for everyone while maintaining loyalty to prophetic leadership and devotion to revealed doctrine. My Brethren have made the case for the metaphor of musket fire, which I have endorsed yet again today. There will continue to be those who oppose our teachings—and with that will continue the need to define, document, and defend the faith. But we all look forward to the day when we can “beat [our] swords into plowshares, and [our] spears into pruninghooks” and, at least on this subject, “learn war [no] more.” And while I have focused on this same-sex topic this morning more than I would have liked, I pray you will see it as emblematic of a lot of issues our students, our communities, and our Church face in this complex, contemporary world of ours. |
Who was the audience for this talk?
The talk was addressed to BYU faculty and staff at a training conference held the week before the new school year.[9] However, a recording of the talk was posted online,[10] and the speech is now part of the required curriculum for BYU students.[11]
What did Elder Holland mean when he brought up "friendly fire"?
While not explicitly stated, it could be an unspecific reference[12] to BYU faculty who have spoken out contrary to the teachings of the Church.[13]
What was the reaction to Elder Holland's talk?
Many LGBTQ+ students reported feeling hurt and unsafe after learning about this talk.[14] Some BYU students and other groups organized protests.[15]
Media and social media reactions were mixed, with some criticizing the talk[16] while others expressed support.[17] At one point, it was listed by BYU as one of the top 30 most "Popular Speeches" at BYU of all time.[18]
What have critics said about the talk?
Some critics of the talk argued the imagery was inappropriate, given the historical and ongoing violence against LGBTQ+ people.[19] Others wrote of worries that this rhetoric could lead to the isolation of LGBTQ+ students who are already at risk of higher rates of suicide and self-harm.[20]
Related Question
Do LGBTQ+ people have a higher-than-average suicide rate?
Read more in LGBTQ+ and Suicide Rates
Did Elder Holland specifically call out a gay BYU student in his talk?
Yes. Elder Holland criticized a student for using his valedictorian speech to announce his sexual orientation at BYU graduation, implying that it was inappropriate.[21] Elder Holland reportedly issued an apology to the parents of the student for any pain he may have caused them.[22]
Did Elder Holland say anything supportive of LGBTQ+ people?
Yes. Elder Holland said the brethren "have spent more time and shed more tears on this subject than we could ever adequately convey to you this morning or any morning."[23]
Related Question
Did BYU practice gay conversion therapy?
Read more in Gay Conversion Therapy and BYU
Had this musket metaphor been used before in the Church?
Yes. Elder Holland was quoting Dallin H. Oaks,[BIO] who had earlier quoted Neal A. Maxwell.[BIO][24] However, other apostles have addressed LGBTQ+ topics at BYU without using this particular metaphor.[25]
Did BYU address the controversy caused by Elder Holland's comments?
No, BYU did not directly address the controversy surrounding Elder Holland's talk. However, the university did denounce an unidentified individual who used an anti-gay slur and poured water on rainbow chalk art that was created in protest of Holland's remarks.[26]
Did Elder Holland ever address the controversy caused by the talk?
Yes. In a 2024 interview, Elder Holland said, in part, "If anybody was hurt [by the talk], and I know some were in that exchange, then I was hurt. If they were hurt, I was hurt. And I have wept. I have wept for those three years."[27] See the full response below.
Church News Podcast Episode 204[28]
Sheri Dew: And among other things that you taught — which there were many things you taught in that message — you touched on some LGBTQ issues as related to campus. The responses to that message were varied. What were you hoping to accomplish in that message? What did you hope came through? |
President Jeffrey R. Holland: What I hoped that would come through is a message to the leadership of an institution. It was the annual University Leadership Conference about how you direct and manage an institution. And I was teaching what I hoped would come through. And that is loyalty to and devotion to and adhering to a never yielding from the mission of Brigham Young University. That is what I hoped would come through. And I did not want it to veer here. I did not want it to veer there. I did not want it to veer up, down, in or out. I wanted to go right down the middle of the doctrinal highway. So, I say, “Lord, I believe. Bless thou my unbelief.” Let’s talk about how we make the university, or keep the university, loyal. Now, if anybody was hurt, and I know some were in that exchange, then I was hurt. If they were hurt, I was hurt. And I have wept. I have wept for those three years. I don’t think anybody has had more people in an office, in a chair, weeping with them than I have in that administration building, with kids who were struggling with gender issues. No one can say that I do not love them. But I am also and was then responsible for the direction of a university. I just wanted to get the supporting doctrine of the Church across. So, anybody else’s pain is my pain out there. I want to say secondly, in that regard, that every student that comes there is safe. We are going to have a safe place for them to talk, for them to be open. Everybody’s safe there. Everybody’s loved there. They are loved by God, and they are loved by us. They are loved by me. They are loved by Shane Reese. Well, I am glad you would raise that, because I want to just leave that much and go on. But I am very unhappy if anybody was hurt. Because that is then my hurt deeply, given the hours and hours and hours that I have spent with kids who struggle with gay issues. So, we will keep trying. We will keep trying to do better. |
Is it true that this talk was added to the required curriculum at BYU?
Yes. Although the original talk was not directed to the general Church membership or the BYU student body, in March 2024, the talk was added to the BYU general education curriculum.[29]